Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HyperFlexed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete --Ryan Delaney talk 22:15, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"little known independant (sic).." = band vanity. Brighterorange 03:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy as CSD A7. android79 03:43, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. As individual, deserving of A7 speedy. If we had it for musical artists he would warrant it as well. Most of his "musical activities" are conducted in forums thus he fails WP:Music dismally. Does assertion of musical participation protect you from A7 speedy even though it is clearly warranted. Capitalistroadster 04:38, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Clear delete, speedy under A7 if appropriate. Capitalistroadster 04:39, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- comment In the recent CSD reform vote, there was a an item like A7 for bands, but it didn't fly. I'd say that's pretty good evidence that bands can't be speedied under A7, sadly. Brighterorange 13:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The article doesn't describe its subject as being in a band. It's an article about one person; A7 applies. android79 13:28, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- I'll buy that--changing my vote to speedy with all deliberate speed. Brighterorange 18:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The article doesn't describe its subject as being in a band. It's an article about one person; A7 applies. android79 13:28, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- comment In the recent CSD reform vote, there was a an item like A7 for bands, but it didn't fly. I'd say that's pretty good evidence that bands can't be speedied under A7, sadly. Brighterorange 13:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain - UniReb 12:04, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't vote on every nomination. If you don't have an opinion on this article, there is no need to cast an abstain vote. android79 12:22, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- It's my right, civic duty, and obligation to voice my opinion and cast any vote I deem necessary. :-P UniReb 12:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- What opinion? android79 12:52, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- "Abstain" status is my opinion that I don't abuse, because I'm either not sure if the information is factual, gibberish, Wiki-worthy, it's missing cited sources, & etc. Although, I do plan on checking back and considering on changing my vote, depending on the circumstances provided. UniReb 12:57, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Might I suggest waiting until you have formed an opinion before casting a vote? android79 13:03, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- perhaps... UniReb 13:26, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Might I suggest waiting until you have formed an opinion before casting a vote? android79 13:03, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- "Abstain" status is my opinion that I don't abuse, because I'm either not sure if the information is factual, gibberish, Wiki-worthy, it's missing cited sources, & etc. Although, I do plan on checking back and considering on changing my vote, depending on the circumstances provided. UniReb 12:57, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- What opinion? android79 12:52, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- It's my right, civic duty, and obligation to voice my opinion and cast any vote I deem necessary. :-P UniReb 12:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't vote on every nomination. If you don't have an opinion on this article, there is no need to cast an abstain vote. android79 12:22, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.